Morphological and Phylogenetic Evaluation of Libellulidae Dragonflies from District Attock, Punjab, Pakistan
Malika Mehreen Nisar1,
Khushi Muhammad1*, Sardar Azhar
Mehmood2, Shabir Ahmed2,
Bibi Nazia Murtaza3 and Muhammad Shahid Nadeem4
1Department of Biotechnology and Genetic
Engineering, Hazara University Mansehra 21300 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
2Department of Zoology, Hazara University
Mansehra 21300 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
3Department of Zoology, Abbottabad University of Science and
Technology (AUST) Abbottabad Pakistan
4Department of Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz
University Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
*For correspondence: Khushisbs@yahoo.com;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4425-4742
Received 24 December 2020;
Accepted 17 July 2021; Published 18 September 2021
Abstract
Dragonflies under the family Libellulidae and order Odonata
have included among the ecosystem friendly insects. In the
present study, we aimed to evaluate the phylogenetics and evolutionary history
of dragonflies at the cross junction of Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces
of Pakistan. The studies were principally based on the morphological characters
of head and wing venation and phylogenetic analysis based on the nucleotide
sequence of 12S rRNA gene. DNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform method and the DNA fragment
was amplified through Polymerase Chain Reaction using 12S rRNA primers.
A total of 233 collected specimens were identified into ten species from four
genera (Crocothemis, Orthetrum, Sympetrum
and Zygonyx) according to their
morphological and morphometric characterization. The nucleotide sequence analysis of 12S rRNA gene had shown genetic
affinities among the subject genera. The phylogenetic tree constructed by
morphological data and 12S rRNA revolved two clades and supported the grouping
of collected specimens. Further phylogenetic analysis based on nucleotide
sequences of 12S rRNA from GenBank generated the phylogenetic tree with four
clades of related species. On the basis of our findings, Crocothemis
erythraea (Bulle 1832)
were placed phylogenetically adjacent to Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus
1758), O. sabina (Drury 1770) to Libellula
nodistica (Hagen 1861) (EF640400.1), O. glaucum (Brauer 1865) to Libellula
saturate (Uhler 1857) (EU054935.1), O. brunneum
(Fonscolombe 1837) to O. brunneum (Fonscolombe
1837) (DQ021416.1), Sympetrum fonscolombii (Selys 1840) to Orthemis ferruginea (Fabricius
1775) (EF640402.1), and Zygonyx torridus (Kirby 1889) to O. pruinosum (Burmeister 1839) (EF640403.1) with minute differences in bootstrap
values. The present report describes an aspect to record and catalogue the
ecosystem friendly insects mostly being threatened. © 2021 Friends
Science Publishers
Keywords: Dragonflies; Ecosystem
friendly; Threatened; Phylogenetics; 12S rRNA
Introduction
The dragonflies are the most abundant and globally
distributed insects except Antarctica. A total of 6500 species globally and 124
species of dragonflies have been reported from Pakistan reported (Mehmood 2016;
Mehmood et al. 2020a). Members of the family Libellulidae, dragonflies
come under sub order Anisoptera and order Odonata. Generally, these dragonflies
are known as Skimmers and possess medium to large body size. Their fossil
history showed the origin from Triassic period (250–200 million years ago) (Zia
2010). The existence of these dragonflies around Indus River shows that the
area is clean and showing the goodness of environment health as these
dragonflies are flying green flags of environment health. The dragonflies
contain 3 phases of life (egg, naiad and adult). Naiad of these dragonflies are
aquatic while adult is terrestrial but at both stages of life they depend on
aquatic environment as they need clean water to survive so their presence shows
the health of aquatic system as well (Zada et al. 2016; Mehmood et al.
2020b). Economically, the dragonflies can be used as biological control as
there adults are important predators of serious insect pests of crops like rice
and cotton. The larvae of dragonflies also feed on mosquito larvae and
therefore, these can be used indirectly to control the dengue and malaria
diseases (Zia et al. 2008).
The Lebellulid dragonflies are differentiated from other
flies as they contain variable body colors and colored patterned wings with a
soaked shaped vein in a hind wing called as anal loop (Samsudin
2013). The veins of wings are very important tool of Libellulidae family for
the study of phylogenetic based on morphological characters. Even though these
characters show similarity with other species of Odonata, but many characters
are still show association when used to segregate other species. The Odonata
species highly depend on characters of wing venation to separate Libellulidae
into different families (Pfau 2005).
For molecular study, 28S and 16S ribosomal RNA are
significant part to check the association between Libellulidae families (Ware et
al. 2007). Furthermore, the nucleotide sequence of EF-1a of nuclear and
mitochondria were also used for phylogenetic study (Ware et al. 2017).
To investigate the evolutionary history of Libellulids dragonflies, the 12S
rRNA of mitochondrial DNA analysis revealed monophyletic relationship of
Anisoptera (Saux et al. 2003; Mehmood et al. 2020a). The present
research work was based on morphological and molecular characters. Previously,
the molecular characterization of Libellulids dragonflies was performed by
Mehmood (2016) and Mehmood et al. (2020a) in Pakistan. In recent years,
several other workers have performed molecular analysis on Odonata taxa (Kim et
al. 2007; Bybee et al. 2008; Fleck et al. 2008; Dumont et
al. 2010; Ballare and Ware 2011; Davis et al. 2011; Kohli et al.
2013; Carle et al. 2015; Bybee et al. 2016, Phan 2019; Saetung and Boonsoong 2019). Keeping in view the importance
of Libellulidae family, the morphological and molecular analysis was done to
confirm phylogenetic association of the related species.
Materials and
Methods
Study Area
Libellulids were collected from District Attock which is in Pothohar
Plateau, Punjab (Pakistan). The area is positioned in the Northern borderline
of Punjab (side of river Indus) and covers an area of 6857 square kilometer at
geographical coordinates 33° 46' 20" North latitude and 72° 22' 6" East
longitude. The average rainfall is 783 mm in this district and the weather is
cold in winters and in warm summers, while Northern part is moist due to high
altitude (Chaudhry 2010).
Collection and Preservation
The specimens
were collected during the months of April to November 2018 from District Attock
with the help of hand net and then they were carefully transferred into
entomological bottles (pour bottom with Cyanide) to kill them (Mehmood et al.
2020b). The samples were brought to Department of Genetics, Hazara University
Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Then the samples were properly pinned on
boards for further identification. The study was composed of two parts i.e. morphological and molecular study.
Identification and Morphometric Analysis
Samples were
identified using identification key developed by Chaudhry (2010) and Fraser
(1934).
Morphometry of abdomen, hind and fore wings were
measured with the help of scale. Morphometric analysis was done through
STATISTICA^ 7 v. 7 (Hilbe 2007) and PASTv. 3.40 software Based on recorded information, the Principal Component
Analysis and Cladogram analysis were constructed. Alpha diversity among all
species was measured based on three morphometric characters (length of fore
wing, hind wing and abdomen). The analysis was performed based on their
morphometric parameters i.e., FW, HW and abdomen. The alpha diversity
was estimated through PAST software. Moreover, Dominance D, Simpson D,
Shannon-H and Evenness were calculated through PAST software.
Morphological characters region (the color and frames of
eye and structure of clypeus) were targeted from head
region, while wing venation, number of nervier and shape of the cells in the
wing were studied for morphological characterization of wings. The
morphological characters of head and wings were recorded and converted into
binary data (1, 0) matrix and these binary characters were analyzed through
PAUP software V. 10.4.
Molecular Analysis
DNA
Extraction
One leg was
separated from each specimen of dragonfly through a forceps and placed in a
labelled 1.5 mL micro centrifuge tube. The leg was cut into pieces with
dissection scissors and ground into fine powder.
The genomic DNA was extracted from the fine powder of
legs of collected specimens by using phenol chloroform method (Watts et al.
2001). The quality of extracted DNA was checked on 1% agarose/TAE gel and the
quantity was observed using spectrophotometer. The agarose gel profiles of DNA
were documented under UV light using UVtec” gel documentation system (Mehmood et
al. 2016).
Selection of Primers and PCR amplification
The extracted
DNA was used for PCR amplification of 12S rRNA gene: The conserve region of 12
S rRNA gene was used for amplification with the primers i.e., 5'AAA CTA
GGA TTA GAT ACC CTA TTA T3´ 12S F, 5' AAG AGC GAC GGG CGA TGT GT3' 12S R that
were adopted from the previous literature (Saux et al. 2003).
For the amplification, 20–30 ng of genomic DNA along with
other the components (1.5 µL MgCl2, 1.5 µL DNTPs, 0.2 µL
Taq Polymerase, 2 µL buffer, 2
µL of forward and reverse primers and 8.8 µL of PCR water with
final volume of 20 µL) of PCR mixture was used (Saiki et al.
1988).
Gene
sequencing
The purified
DNA of nine specimens of the Libellulidae dragonflies were sent for sequencing
to Macrogen Korea http:/www.macrogen.com. All amplified samples of DNA were
successfully sequenced and the retrieved sequences were BLAST in NCBI GenBank
database for sequences comparison, identification and further phylogenetic
study.
Molecular
characterization and Phylogenetic analysis
Sequences of
DNA were aligned applying Muscle alignment (Edgar 2004) and CLUSTAL X 2.1
(Larkin et al. 2007). Aligned data was edited in BioEdit 7.2.5 (Hall
1999). Analyses of Phylogenetic relationship were executed using three methods
namely Maximum parsimony (MP), Maximum likelihood (ML) and Neighbor-Joining
(NJ). Maximum parsimony analyses were performed in PAUP4.0b10 (Swofford 2004).
Maximum likelihood and Neighbor-Joining trees were generated through MEGA6
based on GTRGAMMA model (Tamura et al. 2013). Bootstrap was considered
70% as significant. For tree visualization, Fig Tree 1.4.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree)
was used and tree annotating was done through Adobe Illustrator CS6.
Results
In this
study, 233 specimens of Libellulidae, Odonata were collected from district
Attock. Initially, the collected
specimens were sorted out into 4 genera (Crocothemis, Orthetrum, Sympetrum and Zygonyx) and 10 species (Crocothemis erythraea, C. servilia,
Orthetrum pruinosum, O. brunneum, O. sabina, O. taeniolatum, O. cancellatum, O.
glaucum, Sympetrum fonscolombii and Zygonyx
torridus).
Morphometric and Morphological Analysis of Wings and
Abdomen
The length of three factors i.e., fore
wing, hind wing and abdomen was selected for morphometric analysis. The morphometric data
were analyzed to construct Cladogram/Dendrogram among the Libellulids
species to understand the evolutionary relationship. Cladogram tree constructed
three clades i.e., I, II and III. In clade I, four species had been
clustered while II and III clades contain three species each (Fig. 1). In clade I, the
species Sympetrum fonscolombi showed similarity with Crocothemis
erythraea having bootstrap value 73%. In clade II, O. pronosium showed resemblance with O. bruneum having bootstrap value 75%. In clade III, O. gluacum showed correlation with Z. torridus having bootstrap value 67%
(Fig. 1).
The result of Principal Component Analysis was based on
three morphometric parameters i.e., length of fore wing, hind wing and
abdomen. Among these, one species namely O. teniolatum showed a variable
trend and it was plotted in the region of 0 to -20 toward component 2. While,
other 8 species were observed in the same plot at 0 – to +20. Similarly, O. sabina also showed variable trends and plotted in the region of 0 to -20.
So, high variation was observed for O. sabina and O. teniolatum.
Fore wing (FW) and hind wing (HW) showed correlation toward 0 to + 20 at
component 1 and 0 to +10 at component 2, while abdomen (ABD) showed a variable
trend (0 to +20 at component 1 and 0 to -10 at component 2) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1: Dendrogram constructed based on three morphometric
parameter showing evolutionary relationships among Libellulidae
species
Fig. 2: Principal component plot constructed based on three
morphometric parametric parameters showing relationships among Libellulidae species. PASTv. 3.40
software was used to construct this plot
Alpha diversity among ten species of dragonflies was
estimated on the bases of three morphometric factors i.e., fore wing, hind
wing and abdomen. Various components of the Alpha diversity were resulted i.e. Dominance; D, Simpson_1–D, Shannon H, Evenness_e^H/S, Brillouin, Menhinick, Margalef, Equitability_J, Fisher_alpha, Berger-Parker and Chao-1.
The highest value (2.3) of Shannon_H while the lowest (0.1) value of
Berger-Parkerwas were observed for fore wings. Similar results were obtained
for hind wings. However, in case of abdomen the highest (2.29) value of
Shannon_H and the lowest (0.11) of Berger-Parker were recorded. Further, the
same trend was observed in Dominance_D, Evenness_e^H/S and Equitability_J. In
simpson_1-D the least value was 0.8926 of HW and maximum was 0.9 of FW (Table
1). In Brillouin 2.18 was the lowest value was observed in FW and 2.234 was the
highest value in ABD. In Menhinick 0.5067 was the lowest calculated value in
ABD and 0.586 was maximum value was observed in HW and same trend was
calculated in Margalef and Fisher alpha. 0.113 was the least value of ABD and
0.1564 was the maximum value of FW in Berger-parker (Table 1).
Morphological
characters were recorded from all identified species and then these characters
were converted into numerical/statistical (binary matrix) data i.e. 0 for absent characters and 1 for present. The binary matrix
0,1 data analyzed to construct the phylogenetic tree. The phylogenetic figure
constructed two clades i.e. clade I and II.
Clade I composed of seven species (Crocothemis
erythraea^, O. cancellatum^, Z. toridus^, O. pruinosum^, O. gluacum, S.
fonscolombii and C. servilia).
Fig. 3: Phylogenetic tree constructed based on morphological
characters
Fig. 4: Phylogenetic Tree based on Maximum Likelihood Method of
12S gene sequence of Libellulidae family, Maximum
likelihood bootstrap values are presented above the branches
Whereas, clade II was constructed into three species (O.
brunneum, O. sabina and O. teniolatum)
(Fig. 3).
Molecular Analysis
Evolutionary
relationship of species under the family Libellulidae was done on molecular basis.
A total of 35 nucleotide sequences were analyzed among them 9 sequences of the
current research work, while other 26 sequences were retrieved from GenBank
NCBI, related to family Libellulidae. These sequences were aligned using MUSCLE
and BioEdit. The data was Table 1: Alpha diversity of Libellulidae family based on three morphometric characters
|
FW |
Lower |
Upper |
HW |
Lower |
Upper |
ABD |
Lower |
Upper |
Taxa_S |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Individuals
|
299 |
299 |
299 |
291 |
291 |
291 |
389 |
389 |
389 |
Dominance_D |
0.1005 |
0.1 |
0.1062 |
0.1004 |
0.1009 |
0.1074 |
0.1006 |
0.1006 |
0.1059 |
Simpson_1-D
|
0.8995 |
0.8938 |
0.9 |
0.8996 |
0.8926 |
0.8991 |
0.8994 |
0.8941 |
0.8994 |
Shannon_H |
2.3 |
2.259 |
2.29 |
2.301 |
2.264 |
2.296 |
2.299 |
2.27 |
2.296 |
Evenness_e^H/S |
0.9976 |
0.9574 |
0.9877 |
0.998 |
0.9623 |
0.9938 |
0.9969 |
0.9682 |
0.9938 |
Brillouin |
2.195 |
2.18 |
2.21 |
2.22 |
2.188 |
2.219 |
2.231 |
2.209 |
2.234 |
Menhinick |
0.5768 |
0.5768 |
0.5768 |
0.586 |
0.586 |
0.586 |
0.5067 |
0.5067 |
0.5067 |
Margalef |
1.579 |
1.579 |
1.579 |
1.586 |
1.586 |
1.586 |
1.509 |
1.509 |
1.509 |
Equitability_J |
0.9989 |
0.9811 |
0.9946 |
0.9991 |
0.9833 |
0.9973 |
0.9987 |
0.986 |
0.9973 |
Fisher_alpha |
1.99 |
1.993 |
1.993 |
2.006 |
2.006 |
2.006 |
1.872 |
1.872 |
1.872 |
Berger-Parker
|
0.1164 |
0.1131 |
0.1564 |
0.1133 |
0.1133 |
0.158 |
0.1181 |
0.113 |
0.1515 |
Chao-1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
FW: fore Wings, HW: Hind Wings,
ABD: Abdomen, Taxa: S, group of species, Individual: number of specimens
of each species,
Dominance:
D, Simpson:1-D, Shannon:H and Evenness: e-H/S
used for further analysis of Phylogenetic relationship.
The Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis was done and
constructed phylogenetic tree with length of -10733.49. The Maximum Likelihood
Phylogenetic tree constructed four clades i.e. I, II, III and IV. The
clade I consisted of 5 sequences
and among them Orthetrum*gluacum
showed similarity
with (EU054935.1) Libellula saturate having 59 bootstrap value. Zygonyx torridus had similarity with (EF640403.1) Orthetrum pruinosum which have
60 bootstrap value, while Crocothemis
servilia formed a separate branch. The clad II distributed into 9
sequences, among them Orthetrum sabina
had close resemblance with (EF640400.1) Libellula
nodistica with having 38 bootstrap value. Orthetrum cancellatum showed closeness with C. erythraea and
O.
brunneum has resemblance with
(DQ021416.1) Orthetrum brunneum having
37 bootstrap value (Fig. 4).
Further, the molecular analysis was
also confirmed with Neighbor-Joining (NJ) based method. For NJ analysis, a total of 35 sequences were applied among them 9
sequences were from the present study while others were retrieved from GenBank
data. The NJ phylogenetic tree was constructed of optimal length
22.41725 and having 325 characters. The NJ Phylogenetic tree was consisted of
three clades i.e. I, II, and III. The clade I consisted on 14 sequences
in which one sequence (Orthetrum brunneum) of the present study has close resemblance with (DQ021416.1) Orthetrum,
brunneum. Six nucleotide sequences were gathered in clade II.
Sympetrum fonscolmbii, had similarity with the sequences of Orthemis
ferruginea and Crocothemis servilia with bootstrap value 44 and 15
respectively. The clade III consisted of 7 nucleotide sequences. In this clade Orthetrum
gluacum showed affinity with Libellula luctuosa having bootstrap
value 45. Threes sequences (Zygonyx torridus, Orthetrum pruinosum and O.
Sabina) were gathered in this clade with bootstrap value 54. Libellula
nodistica showed affinity with Orthetrum sabina having bootstrap
value 39. Two sequences Orthetrum cancellatum and Crocothemis erythreae,
expressed similarity with sequence of Libellula forensis, Trithemis
aurora and Orthetrum pruinosum, showing bootstrap value 53
(Fig. 5).
Maximum Parsimony (MP) tree constructed
4 clades i.e. I, II, III and IV. Sixteen nucleotide sequences were clustered
in clade I. Orthetrum brunneum clustered with 15 sequences having
bootstrap value 64 (which extracted from GenBank data). Three sequences i.e.,
Orthetrum cancellatum, Crocothemis erythraea and O. Sabinawere
gathered in clade II and showed relationship with 3 species of Libellula
genus. Nine sequences were clustered in clade III. Zygonyx
torridus, Orthetrum pruinosum and O. gluacum had affinity with Libellula
luctuosa with bootstrap number 42 while Sympetrum fonscolombii reflected
relationship to Libellula luctuosa with bootstrap value 43. Sympetrum
fonscolombii came into neighbor branch of Orthemis ferruginea and Crocothemis
servilia and expressed 55 bootstrap number. While, Crocothemis servilia
formed an isolated branch (Fig. 6).
Evolutionary tree was also constructed based on Maximum
Parsimony Method (tree length of 3440 which had consistency index 0.275000,
0.494528 was its retention index and the composite index was 0.135995$ for all sites)
and Neighbor-Joining Method (tree length 22.41725) (Fig. 6).
Discussion
Fig. 6: Phylogenetic tree based on Maximum Parsimony method of
12S gene sequence of Libellulidae family, Maximum
Parsimony bootstrap values are presented above the branches.
Fig. 5: Phylogenetic tree based on Neighbor-Joining Method of
12S gene sequence of Libellulidae family,
Neighbor-Joining bootstrap values are presented above the branches.
Libullid Dragonflies are members of family Libellulidae. Being very sensitive to
the water conditions (Kietzka
et al. 2017), the dragonflies are considered as eco-friendly insects which serve as the indicators of environmental pollution, especially
water pollution (Simon et al. 2019). Dragonflies also provide an
attractive alternative to the chemical control of mosquitos in the water bodies
(Norma-Rashid
and Saleeza 2014). Worldwide changes in the
environment with enhanced metal content and pollution have seriously disturbed
the distribution of dragonflies; many species have become endangered (Kadoya et al. 2009; Ferreira et
al. 2014; Beaune and Sellier 2021). The present study was
conducted to record the species of dragonflies in the water bodies of Attock,
an area at the transection of two Pakistani provinces. The morphological
characters including the pattern of wings venation were used for the
identification of and characterization of taxa in various groups and subgroups.
This research represents the first report of its type in the study area, based
on molecular and morphological characterization of family Libellulidae. On the
basis of morphological characters, the specimens were characterized into ten
species with four genera. The systematic study of dragonfly, which was given by
previous workers, the results of current study support the work (Fraser 1936;
Tillyard and Fraser 1940; Carle 1995; Bechly 1996; Zia 2010). Previously, the
integrative approach (morphological and molecular) have
been used to find out the phylogenetic patter of Odonate fauna from various
regions of world (Mehmood 2016; Huang et al. 2020).
The outcomes and the results
of the present work could be compared with the morphological and morphometric
study of Chaudhry (2010) and Raza (2016). Findings of the morphometric
and morphological of the present study were found similar with the earlier
results of different workers (Manwar et al. 2012;
Pilgrim and Dohlen 2012; Eslami et al. 2015). The estimation phylogeny
of Odonate would be useful to understand interspecific relationship and
integration of morphological and molecular data could be more important for
better phylogenetic estimation among the members of
dragonfly (Huang et al. 2020).
Results of present work comprised of phylogenetic analysis using 12S DNA primer sequences yielded phylogenetic affiliation
of group Libellulidae (Dumont et al. 2010; Bastos et al. 2021). The remarkable
results were yielded by Rach et al. (2008).
During phylogenetic analysis, the close relationship with other members of
Libellulidae has been recorded and the reported members have been collected
from various regions of world. Recently, the morphological and phylogenetic
characters have been discussed to explore distribution and migration pattern of
different species of Odonata (Huang et al. 2020; Bastos et al.
2021).
The amplified 12S RNA of
mitochondrial region showed that Crocothemis erythraea have genetic
similarity to Orthetrum cancellatum
(Maximum
Likelihood Bootstrap =49%, Neighbor Joining Bootstrap =37% Maximum Parsimony
Bootstrap =40%) while Crocothemis servilia made isolated division. Our study
confirmed the previous work of researchers and strongly supported the monophyly
of Libellulidae dragonflies with some variation of sequences at several clades
(Ware et al. 2007; Bybee et al. 2008; Fleck et al. 2008;
Dumont et al. 2010; Bastos et al. 2021). The current phylogenetic work comprised of 12S
information expressed the genetic resemblance of O. brunneum with O.brunneum (DQ021416.1), Libellula quadirmaculata
(EU477729.1) and Ladona depressa (EU477730.1). Similarly, Ware et al.
(2007) had recorded the relationship of family Libellulidae with Acisoma with Bradinopyga,
Crocothemis and Palpopleura. Using similar techniques, on
Anisoptera, the evolutionary relation genus Crocothemis, Rhyothemis and
Palpopleura had been reported (Carle et al. 2015). Current study
based on molecular basis identified that earlier study was with Accordace as
Pilgrim and Dohlen (2008) and they comprised of Brachyothemis with Deielia
phaon. Same as, genetic relation was identified with Tholymis and
Zyxomma (Ware et al. 2007; Dijkstra and Schröter 2020). However, Carle et al. (2015) have
elaborated relationship (evolutionary) of Brachyothemis with Tramea,
Psuedothemis and Tholymis.
Conclusion
The present
work investigated the morphological and molecular identification of
dragonflies. The wings and abdomen were targeted in morphological
identification and the nucleotide sequences of 12S rRNA were retrieved from the
morphologically characterized specimens of dragonfly. During morphological and
morphometric analysis, ten species
were identified belonging to four genera. The molecular based analysis recorded
that Crocothemis erythraea have
genetic similarity to Orthetrum cancellatum, while Crocothemis
servilia made isolated division.
Further, it was revealed that O. Sabina grouped with Libellula
nodistica (EF640400.1) and O. glaucum grouped with Libellula
saturate (EU054935.1) and L. luctuosa (AY282563.1). Similarly, O.
brunneum had genetic similarity with O. bruneum (DQ021416.1) and Sympetrum
fonscolombii with Orthemis ferruginea
(EF640402.1) and Zygonyx
torridus with O. pruinosum. However, molecular techniques of 12S gene presented the
superlative outcomes at all and it could help to resolve the phylogenetic of
unknown dragonfly.
Acknowledgements
Authors are grateful to the students and staff of
Department of Genetics who helped in the management of samples and lab studies.
Author Contributions
Malika Mehreen Nisar performed main
experiments and applied molecular analysis, Khushi Muhammad supervised research
and provided guidelines for writing manuscript, Sardar Azhar Mehmood helped in
sample collection and species identification, Shabbir Ahmed helped in writing
and data analysis, Bibi Nazia Murtaza helped in experimentation design and
proofreading, Muhammad Shahid Nadeem helped in the revision of manuscript and
data analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of
interest.
Data Availability
The data presented in this study are available on request from the
corresponding author.
Ethics Approval
There is no direct involvement of
animals or humans. However, the study was approved by the 20th meeting of the
Advanced Studies and Research Board, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
References
Ballare EF, JL Ware (2011). Dragons
fly, biologists classify: An overview of molecular odonate studies, and our
evolutionary understanding of dragonfly and damselfly (Insecta: Odonata)
behavior. Intl J Odonatol 14:137‒147
Bastos CR, LS Brasil, JMB Oliveira-Junior, FG Carvalho,
GD Lennox, J Barlow, L Juen (2021). Morphological and phylogenetic factors
structure the distribution of damselfly and dragonfly species (Odonata) along
an environmental gradient in Amazonian streams. Ecol Indicat 122:107257
Beaune
D, Y Sellier (2021). Stream restorations with meanders increase dragonfly and damselfly
diversity and abundance, including an endangered species. J Nat Conserv 1; Article 125950
Bechly G (1996).
Morphologische untersuchungen am flügelgeäder der rezenten libellen und deren stammgruppenvertreter (Insecta; Pterygota; Odonata) unter besonderer berücksichtigung
der phylogentischen systematik und des grundplanesder odonata. In: Petalura, pp:1‒402, Redmond, Germany
Brauer F(1865). Bericht über die von Herrn Baron Ransonnet am
Rothen Meere und auf Ceylon gesammelten
Neuropteren (L.). Verhandli Zool-Bot Gesellsch 15:1009‒1018
Burmeister H (1839). Handbuch
der Entomologie. Zweiter Band. Besondere Entomologie, pp:755‒1050. Zweite Abtheilung. Kaukerfe. Gymnognatha (Zweite
Hälfte; vulgo Neuroptera). Berlin, Germany
Bybee S, C Aguilar, Alex, M Duryea, R Futahashi, H
Bengt, L Carballa, M Olalla, R Schilder, R Stoks, A Suvorov, E Svensson, J
Swaegers, Y Takahashi, W Phillip, M Wellenreuther (2016). Odonata (dragonflies
and damselflies) as a bridge between ecology and evolutionary genomics. Front
Zool 13; Article 46
Bybee
SM, HT Ogden, MA Branham, MF Whiting (2008). Molecules, morphology and fossils:
A comprehensive approach to odonate phylogeny and the evolution of the odonate
wing. Cladistics 23:1‒38
Carle
FL (1995). Evolution, taxonomy, and biogeography of ancient Gondwanian
libelluloides, with comments on anisopteroid evolution and phylogenetic
systematics (Anisoptera: Libelluloidea). Odonatologic 24:383‒424
Carle FL, KM Kjer, ML May
(2015). A molecular phylogeny and classification of Anisoptera (Odonata). Arthropod
Syst Phylog 73:281‒301
Chaudhry MT (2010).
Systematics of dragonflies (Anisoptera: Odonata) of Pakistan. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Entomology Faculty of
Crop and Food Sciences Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University,
Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Davis
RB, DB Nicholson, ELR Saunders, PJ May (2011). Fossil gaps inferred from
phylogenies alter the apparent nature of diversification in dragonflies and
their relatives. BMC Evol Biol 11:252‒261
Dijkstra KD, A Schröter (2020). Field Guide to the
Dragonflies of Britain and Europe, 2nd Edition. Bloomsbury
Publishing, London, UK
Drury D (1770). Illustrations
of Natural History; wherein are exhibited upwards of two hundred and forty
figures of exotic insects according to their genera, p:130. London, UK
Dumont
HJ, A Vierstraete, JR Vanfleteren (2010). A molecular phylogeny of the Odonata
(Insecta). Syst Entomol 35:6‒18
Edgar
RC (2004). MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.
Nucl Acids Res 32:1792‒1797
Eslami Z, SP Rad, HJ
Dumont (2015). Dragonflies (Odonata) found in the central of Iran (the
Northwest of Isfahan province). Intl J Zool Res 5:25‒32
Fabricius JC (1775). Systema
entomologiae, sistens insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, adiectis
synonymis, locis, descriptionibvs, observationibvs. In: Officina libraria Kortii, pp:42–426. Flensburgi et Lipsiae,
Official Library, Milan, Italy
Ferreira
S, G Velo-Anton, C Brochard, C Vieira, PC Alves, DJ Thompson, PC Watts, JC Brito
(2014). A critically endangered new dragonfly species from Morocco: Onychogomphus boudoti spp. nov. (Odonata:
Gomphidae). Zootaxa 3856:349‒365
Fleck G, M Brenk, B Misof (2008). Larval and molecular characters help to
solve phylogenetic puzzles in the highly diverse dragonfly family Libellulidae
(Insecta: Odonata: Anisoptera): The Tetrathemistinae are a polyphyletic group. Org Divers
Evol 8:1‒16
Fonscolombe MBD (1837). Monographie des libellules des
environs d'Aix. Ann Soc Entomol France
6:129‒150
Fraser FC (1936). The Fauna of British India
Including Ceylon and Burma. Today and Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers.
New Delhi, India
Fraser
FC (1934). Fauna of British India. Tayler and Francis Ltd., London
Hagen HA (1861). With a list of the South American species. Smithsonian Miscellaneous
Collections, pp:1‒347. Synopsis of
the Neuroptera of North America
Hall T (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly
biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT.
Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95‒98
Hilbe JM (2007). STATISTICA 7. Amer Stat 6:91‒94
Huang S, H Wang, W Yang, Y Si,
Y Wang, M Sun, X Qi, Y Bai (2020). Phylogeny of Libellulidae (Odonata:
Anisoptera): comparison of molecular and morphology-based phylogenies based on
wing morphology and migration. Peer J 8; Article e8567
Kadoya T, SI Suda,
I Washitani (2009). Dragonfly crisis in Japan: a likely consequence of recent
agricultural habitat degradation. Biol Conserv 142:1899‒1905
Kietzka GJ, JS Pryke, MJ
Samways (2017). Aerial adult dragonflies are highly sensitive to in-water
conditions across an ancient landscape. Divers Distribut 23:14‒26
Kim KG, SK Jang, DW Park, MY Hong, KH Oh, KY Kim, JS
Hwang, YS Han, IS Kim (2007). Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation of the tiny
dragonfly, Nannophya pygmaea
(Odonata: Libellulidae). Intl J Ind Entomol 15:47‒58
Kirby WF (1889). A revision of the
subfamily Libellulinae, with descriptions of new genera and genera. [Date
important, cf Selys' Odonates de Sumatra]. In:
Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, Vol. 12, pp:249‒348, London, UK
Kohli
MK, T Schneider, O Mueller, JL Ware (2013). Counting the spots: a molecular and
morphological phylogeny of the spotted darner Boyeria (Odonata: Anisoptera:
Aeshnidae) with an Lemphasis on European taxa. Syst Entomol 39:190‒195
Larkin
MA, G Blackshields, NP Brown, R Chenna, PA
McGettigan, H McWilliam, DG Higgins. (2007). Clustal W and Clustal X version
2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947‒2948
Linnaeus C (1758). Per regna tria
naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus,
differentilis, synonymis, locis. In:
Systema Naturae, pp:1‒823. Editio Decima. Tomus I. Laurentii
Salvii, Holmiae
Manwar NA, PP Rathod, IA Raja (2012). Odonata fauna of
Chatri Lake region of Amravati, Maharashtra, India. Bioherald 2:521‒523
Mehmood SA (2016). Analysis of species diversity of odonata in hazara region of Pakistan through conventional and
molecular approaches. PhD Thesis. Department of Zoology, Hazara
University Mansehra, Pakistan
Mehmood SA, MS Ahmad, A Zia, S Ahmad, M Shah, W
Khan, WA Panhwar (2020a). Molecular and Phylogenetic analysis of family
Aeshnidae of Hazara region Pakistan. Intl J Agric Biol 25:109‒116
Mehmood SA, A Zia, S Ahmad, M Shah, W Khan, WA
Panhwar, I Ullah (2020b). Seasonal abundance and distribution of dragonflies in
upper Siran valley of District Mansehra, Pakistan. Braz
J Biol 81:785-791
Mehmood SA, MS Khan, A Zia, FA Shaheen (2016).
Morphological evaluation of Gomphidae dragonflies of Hazara region of Pakistan
through principle component analysis. J Entomol Zool Stud
4:183‒188
Norma-Rashid Y, SN Saleeza (2014). Eco-friendly
control of three common mosquito larvae species by Odonata nymphs. In: Basic
and Applied Aspects of Biopesticides, pp:235‒243.
Springer, New Delhi, India
Pfau HK (2005). Structure, function and evolution of the ‘glans’ of the anisopteran vesica spermalis (Odonata). Intl J Odonatol 8:259‒310
Pilgrim EM, CDV Dohlen
(2012). Phylogeny of the dragonfly genus Sympetrum (Odonata: Libellulidae). Org
Divers Evol 12:281‒295
Pilgrim EM, CDV Dohlen (2008). Phylogeny of the
Sympetrinae (Odonata: Libellulidae): further evidence of the homoplasious
nature of wing venation. Syst Entomol 33:159‒174
Phan Q (2019). The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species: Copera chantaburii [Online].
Retrieved from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/190834/8834941
Rach J, R
DeSalle, IN Sarkar, B Schierwater, H Hadrys (2008). Character-based DNA
barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:237‒247
Raza
KA (2016). Altitudinal distribution of dragonflies of sub
Himalayan hill tracts of Pakistan. M.Phil
Thesis. Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan
Saetung
T, B Boonsoong (2019). A review of genus Agriocnemis larva (Odonata:
Coenagrionidae) from Thailand including a description of the final stadium
larva of Agriocnemis minima Selys,
1877 with supporting molecular (COI) data. Zootaxa
4711:579‒599
Saiki
RK, DH Gelfand, S Stoffel, SJ Scharf, R Higuchi, GT Horn, KB Mullis, HA Erlich
(1988). Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA
polymerase. Science 239:487‒491
Samsudin BN (2013). Morphological variation of selected species in the
genus Orthetrum (Odonata: Anisoptera) in
Sarawak. B.S. Thesis. Department of Zoology Faculty of Resource
Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia
Selys LED (1840). Monographie
des Libellulidées d’Europe, pp:1‒220. Librairie Encyclopedia de Roret, Paris & Co,
Carlo, France
Simon E, B Tóthmérész, O Kis,
T Jakab, PÉ Szalay, A Vincze, E Baranyai, S Harangi, M Miskolczi, G Dévai
(2019). Environmental-friendly contamination assessment of habitats based on
the trace element content of dragonfly exuviae. Water 11; Article 2200
Swofford DL (2004). PAUP*:
phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer,
Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA
Tamura K, G Stecher, D
Peterson, A Filipski, S Kumar (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics
analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725‒2729
Tillyard RJ, FC Fraser (1940).
A reclassification of the order Odonata based on some new interpretation of the
venation of the dragonfly wing. Part III. Continuation and conclusion. Aust
Zool 9:359‒396
Uhler PR (1857). Contributions to the Neuropterology of the
United States. No. 1. Proc Acad Nat Sci
Philadelph 9:87‒88
Ware JL, E Pilgrim, ML May, TW
Donnelly, K Tennessen (2017). Phylogenetic relationships of North American Gomphidae and their close relatives. Syst Entomol
42:347‒358
Ware
JL, ML May, KM Kjer (2007). Phylogeny of the higher Libelluloidea (Anisoptera:
Odonata): An exploration of the most speciose superfamily of dragonflies. Mol
Phylogenet Evol 45:289‒310
Watts
PC, DJ Thompson, SJ Kemp (2001). A protocol for non-destructive extraction of DNA
from odonates. Odonatologica 30:223‒226
Zia A (2010). Biosystematics
of damselflies (Zygoptera: Odonata) of Pakistan. Ph.D. Thesis.
Department of Entomology Faculty of Crop and Food Sciences Pir Mehr Ali Shah
Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Zia A, M Naeem, MA Rafi, SA
Hassan (2008). A list of damselflies (Zygoptera: Odonata) recorded from Azad
Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Biol Sci
51:329‒332